During a congressional hearing, Tennessee Representative
Steven Cohan tore into the Deputy Director of the White House Office of
National Drug Control Policy head of the War on Drugs, Michael Botticelli
on Tuesday. His attack was vicious. The major thrust of his tirade was that
smoking marijuana is not a problem but heroin and cocaine are. Marijuana does
not cause cirrhosis of the liver, which makes alcohol bad, heroin is addictive
so it bad but pot does not do these things so that makes it good. No one is
addicted to marijuana or die from smoking marijuana. The war on drugs is a
failure, he declared. To me this is an example of disjointed logic. Was he
saying we should stop trying to prevent the use and importation of all drugs? Was
he advocating the legalization of all drugs?
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com
Comments Invited and not moderated
We must try to debunk the myth that marijuana does no harm;
it does harm. Smoking marijuana does impair judgment; that is why Obama so
clearly stated, “to inhale is the whole idea”. If you evaluate the judgment of
people without marijuana and people after smoking marijuana, what would you
expect; that after smoking marijuana their judgment on average would be better?
Ridiculous! Cannabis alters the mind; that is why people smoke it and cancer
patients use it. It does not make you a better driver as I have been told by a
pot head. I would like to ask Steve Cohan if a pot smoking train operator runs
into the back end of the train in front of him a kills three or four people if
those people died from marijuana. If he also dies in the accident, did marijuana
do him any harm? If the operator were drunk there, would be no debate—zero;
alcohol kills people.
Don't forget that "affluenza" also kills. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/06/us-usa-affluenza-texas-idUSBREA1503X20140206
ReplyDeleteI agree.
Delete