Friday, November 20, 2015

CHRISTIAN HYPOCRITES KEEP OUT REFUGEES

The response of people to the Syrian refugee crisis has provided real proof of the religious sincerity of people's beliefs. Most of us abhor any suggestion of the need for a religious test for anything. Donald Trump’s call for proof of religious affiliation of all Muslims in America met with an outcry of disgust. People of all lifestyles likened it to requiring a yellow lapel star required of Jews in Nazi Germany as an object of hate and discrimination or the internment of Japanese citizens during the Second World War for fear of sabotage. I was born and raised in this country. As a result, I am sensitive to the nuances of politics. One such nuance is that a person has to believe in “God” if people are to vote them into political office. This has so much force that we refuse to believe it is a religious test, but it is. Not only do they have to believe in a Judeo-Christian God, but also they have to prove it by regular church attendance. As happened with President Obama, that wasn’t enough. The incident over President Obama and Rev. Jeremiah Wright proved that the people had to agree with what the politician heard in his church. However, the intensity of this belief system works both ways. Potential candidates for public office suddenly become believers in God, which happens about the time they decide on a political career. Their campaigns publish pictures of them standing on Church steps, often with their wives or husbands dutifully at their sides: the American image. Of course, they are often hypocrites. They will proclaim loudly and publically their beliefs in church doctrine such as “love thy neighbor” and forgiveness of sins. Many of them extend this to their politics when they claim they are constitutional fundamentalists and adapt Church dogma in legislation they propose such as denial of same-sex marriage or abortion rights etc. as being biblical based. This they deduce from the belief that you have the freedom to worship as you choose; however, you must worship a Christian God. This is especially true of New Testament Christians. Obviously, Christians exclude Muslims, as they do to Jews to a certain extent. People of the Jewish faith have learned not to lie about their faith but not to confess their faith too loudly. All of this has resulted in the politically awkward situation we have today. This cluster of beliefs has grouped many of these people into the Republican Party, which has created a situation where religious beliefs conflict with their political beliefs. The fundamental Republican tenet is that of greed; what is mine is mine; I earned it I should be able to keep it, or I will only share when I am sure I have all I need. Of course, some people never have all they think they need. We apply this feeling to the territory as well as money, economic values, or power which in turn creates a sense of belonging. This is the same idea as moral groups, which is what a church is. You can go to heaven only if you belong to the right church. If you do not believe this, ask them. This has created a terrible dilemma for the Republican Party Christians. They have a strong sense of belonging and do not want to jeopardize the trust their Party puts in them. They are Christians so because of their “love they neighbor” beliefs they feel an obligation to help people in need such as the Syrian refugees. However, the Republican Party believes American territory is for Americans and others should stay out. This is where the rubber hits the road. All of the hypocrites, those who became Christians for political gain, are all on Facebook explaining why it is OK to exclude all Syrians using the excuse that one of them might be terrorists. Isn’t it strange that all those so-called Christians are taking the position that just happens to be the way Republicans and not Christians think. Their position proves they are Republicans before they are Christians. I look with pride at the position President Obama has taken; he has taken the Christian position. He has a heart. Some Republicans, especially the religious hypocrites, have the audacity “to act” outraged that our president is saying Republicans are acting against widows and orphans when they deny entry to ten thousand refugees because one of them just might be a terrorist. They are not acting against terrorist, rather they are acting out of territorial greed, this is their country, and they don’t want Syrians here any more than they want Latinos of Haitians, or anyone else. URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated

4 comments:

  1. Though many of the points are correct, I must say you did do a great deal of targeting Christians, which as a believer myself, is a little disheartening but is not of much importance in regards to politics. To be a Christian, Male, and White is now what I feel is a social outcast and is targeted enough by the feminist, ethnic groups, GLBT movements.

    To have a difference of opinion against a democrat in any topic you described, we are ridiculed as: "Homophobic, Sexist, Racist," and as you put, "Hypocrites". Labeled as Republican and as "greedy" upon an opinion we have... Although your opinions are the "only correct ones." There is no possible discussion because people are afraid of people like you making accusations. No one wants to labeled but Your political party made it acceptable to label any other opinion a person has as a personal attack on status, sexual status, race, and or gender. I'll return to your discussion about Syrian immigrants later.

    Your political party wanted to remove religion from politics, I'm fine with that, then your party wanted to make decisions for my religion, that's where I started getting upset, Then your party is now targeting my religion and labeling us.

    Through out all this I don't see much difference from Nazi Germany or Japanese citizens in World War II, it's a sad time to be a white christian male. Thank you, it's your ideology that only created another target for a country to hate. But I'll let you assume it was republican greed that created it vs. a political party creating a label for us.

    As for the Syrian refugees, let's have them come, if they come, what is the total estimated number that will come? We'll say an estimate of 10% of the current population which is roughly 3 million people. I'm fine with allowing them into the boarders.

    Now that leaves roughly 20 million people still in Syria possibly still in need. Would leaving those 20 million in need to deal with their problems the same "christian position" you are prideful to see Obama taking. I see the same hypocritical stance in a different way.

    Do we our open our doors and turn our backs to who is left outside?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Your political party wanted to remove religion from politics, I'm fine with that, then your party wanted to make decisions for my religion, that's where I started getting upset, Then your party is now targeting my religion and labeling us."
      I am sorry it is not my party, it is the Constitution. It is your religion that wants to decide for me. For example, the county clerk that will not issue same sex marriage licences because she is a "Christian."

      Delete
    2. "Your political party wanted to remove religion from politics, I'm fine with that, then your party wanted to make decisions for my religion, that's where I started getting upset, Then your party is now targeting my religion and labeling us."
      I am sorry it is not my party, it is the Constitution. It is your religion that wants to decide for me. For example, the county clerk that will not issue same sex marriage licences because she is a "Christian."

      Delete
  2. Although older, I feel Brigitte gives a good example on why there is fear when it comes to allowing people in. It doesn't directly involve Syria but I feel it is a good point to be made, We know it isn't all Muslim/Syrian Refugees but their is an immense population of ISIS fighters, who A) already could be in the United States. B) Left to join ISIS C) are attempting to enter the United States.

    I always find it funny that someone turns it into a race/religion banter.


    Brigitte Gabriel gives FANTASTIC answer to Muslim woman claiming all Muslims are portrayed badly

    https://youtu.be/Ry3NzkAOo3s

    ReplyDelete