Tuesday, October 28, 2014

BRAS AND BURKAS

The controversy over burkas troubles me. Almost everyday someone posts a hate-filled note on his or her wall filled with buzzwords. Somehow, burkas are associated with evil. The last one, dealing with Canadian naturalization and immigration, people complained that the people wearing burkas did so because they did not want to reveal their faces so authorities could identify them, as they do to everyone else. This implies that “these people”, “Muslims” of course, wear the face and body coverings the way they do because they want special privileges; so they can sneak into “our country” for nefarious purposes such as “behead” people, “bomb innocent Christians”. The most usual rant settles into a diatribe ending with, “if they want to live in the United States, Canada, England, or France, they should dress the way “we” do or leave”, which, of course, introduces the “right wing tough guy” rhetoric into the augment.

Seriously, why do all people wear the clothing they do? In the past, I have made the mistake of limiting my thinking to clothing of religious significance. Of course, such clothing, often gender specific, is a way of identifying themselves with one or another religions or sect within that religion; thus, includes the requirement of women wearing of head coverings in Catholic churches or Jewish men wearing their kippah also known as a yarmulke. In some communities, Jewish women wear hair coverings after marriage, etc. It means little or nothing.

Recently, I read a short piece about Palestinian women dreading going through military check point in going from Gaza to Israel and having young Israelis soldiers feeling (patting down) their bodies for arms and hidden explosives. This is obviously significant and offensive. Regardless, to do this, under the circumstance in which they live, makes perfect sense. In addition, it makes it perfectly obvious wearing such clothing is a clash of cultures. The salient feature of all of this, the one I missed, is that it is “cultural”, which is social behavior modified by circumstance over time; sometimes over a long, long time and other times, not so much.

The objective of wearing burkas, or a full body cloak, or just a hijab, defined in a limited way only as the head covering, is a genders specific matter related to female modesty; a modification of social behavior in force for thousands of years and so imbedded in our natural history that it seems innate. In the west, we have shed most such modification, if some of the extremes were ever a custom. As said, we see mention made of this obvious clash of starkly different cultures in ugly ways on our Facebook pages, which caused me to struggle with the idea of what do we have in our culture dealing with modesty, if anything, that is equivalent. Once I shed the religious connotation and concentrated on clothing in general, an example come to mind; that example was the bra.

As schoolchildren, we learned about primitive tribes all over the world. Without having it pointed out, we just understood they were a topless or bra less—no big deal. We also know that without fanfare, almost universally bras became necessary as part of a woman’s underwear. Over time, it seems almost innate with little notice except, perhaps, the era of bra burning, the era of self-imposed female liberation leaving the unanswered question, “Liberation from what?” The same question I am asking about the burka.

A woman, at least some women, feels very uncomfortable without wearing a bra. However, women do not feel pressured from men or other women to wear bras, they just do’ it is a cultural thing. In the Muslim world, wearing burkas is like wearing bras in our culture. We are told that in the Muslim world, the men, at least some men, insist their wives and daughter wear burkas or hijab. However, and notably, it appears to be like wearing a bra, even if the men said nothing, the women would insist on wearing the burkas or hijab. To put this in perspective, tell a woman standing in a Transportation Administration Authority (TSA) line at a United States or Canadian airport that she cannot wear a burka. In both of our cultures, it would be like telling a woman in such a line that she cannot wear a bra; it would be ridiculous—in addition, that surly would quickly introduce you to a cultural clash in the raw. The Israelis and the TSA solved this type of problem, not completely, but solved this type of problem simply by having female soldiers do the “pat downs”. TSA could do the same. Nevertheless, It would not solve all of the problem.  I do remember the news-making clash in the U.S. of a male screaming at a male TSA person, “Do not touch my junk”. Similarly, in their culture, there will be women who object to same sex body searches because only their husbands are supposed to see their faces, or hair, or body outlines and no one else of either gender.


I remember my shock at being woke up to finding out that in America things in the rest of the world are not always the way we think they are. Several years ago, there was a news program where an overbearing female talking head from a major news network, who had been a vocal and long time strong advocate of woman’s rights often screaming about “how mistreated Muslim women are in the land of the suppressed ” in contrast to those in the U.S. in the land of the free. This is the often-expressed attitude that people in the U.S. are always better than is everyone else. This female activist went to one of the Muslim countries to interview women in respect to these things. Her disappointment was almost palpable when she asked Muslim women how they felt about being “forced to cover up their bodies and faces” and being “so terrible” suppressed by the men. She obviously expected them to lament how miserable they were and how horrible it was and how envious they are of all the freedom women have in the United States enjoy; rather, every single woman she asked, answered that they didn’t feel suppressed; they like things the way they are. What a shock! The news media had exposed us to countless news reports, as news normally go, only the bad stuff was mentioned; about how Muslim women are beaten, raped killed, and subjected to honor killings, etc. Undeniably, some of this takes place especially in areas were there is social strife. As a consequence, we collectively, assume that the “all woman” in the Muslims world wear burkas because they fear being beaten if they don’t. Can we ever learn that they wear face coverings because in their culture, it is like wearing a bra, they want to dress that way? 


URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated

4 comments:

  1. Jerry, you logic is seriously flawed on this issue.
    A bra is an item that has been developed that is physically useful and an aid to women for support. You are aware that breasts have no muscle so exterior support for both health and comfort is necessary. Women all over the world of all faiths use them. It is physically liberating.

    Burkas and naquibs are the opposite and serve no physical purpose. In fact they are physically confining and restricting. Imagine eating, drinking, talking or even identifying other women when they are all hidden behind these. Of course cultures where women wear these do not allow women to leave home unless accompanied by a male relative so I guess those women could guess who the other hidden women are by identifying the men that are watching over them.

    Burkas and naquibs are a symbol of repression and subjugation of women by fanatic Wahhabi/Salafi religions. Imagine you trying to convince your daughters and grand daughters that they are not allowed to show their face in public !!! They are symbols to these religious fascists no different the a swastika is a symbol to racist fascists.

    You state that surveys have been taken where these hidden women have replied that they are more comfortable when veiled in public. Of course they are after centuries of victimization and repression. In their society the absolute control of women is what the whole family honour is based upon. The women's very lives many depend upon their acceptance of not being seen in public. Their feeling of discomfort at the prospect of not being veiled in public is a symptom of battered women's syndrome.

    This is not new. Jerry do you know that when Arab merchants and diplomats first came to Europe in the 17th -19th centuries they were appalled and aghast at the respect and chivalrous way that European men treated European women. The concept of deep respect for women was so alien to them.

    Just think of the perverted world view that boys and girls have being raised in families and a culture where women cannot show their face in public, a mans word is worth that of 4 women, men can have multiple wives, etc.

    I have daughters and a gran daughter. I am horrified and any thought that they would ever be subjected to treatment like this.

    EVIL TRIUMPHS WHEN GOOD PEOPLE DO NOTHING.

    Bart Zimmer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bart:

      I enjoyed reading your the response. Keep it up.

      You miss the point of the article. A swastika is a symbol of racist fascists. Germans wearing swastikas force Jews to wear a yellow star. A small vocal group of people forced other people to wear yellow stars. This radical minority group mistreated, then beat, and eventually killed anyone wearing a star. In the United States, I see the same thing happening with those wearing Burkas.

      Consider this; those wearing swastikas were a small minority, in other words, it was not all the German people just a radical few. The basis, for us as a people, to condemn those wearing burkas has no foundation any more than German people had a foundation for condemning Jews. The point of my article was that I was shocked to learn that Muslim women do not feel as you think they should feel. They do not feel suppressed; they want to wear the Burkas; it is their culture, their custom. You made it clear that you do not accept that as reality. A small group is leading the “hate Muslim” charge. I see this as evil. It is not wrong to condemn all Germans for what happened in 1930’s and 1949’s because they stood by a let it happen; As you remind us, EVIL TRIUMPHS WHEN GOOD PEOPLE DO NOTHING. I wrote what I wrote because I do not want to stand by and watch evil triumph.

      Here is the challenge; demonstrate to me that Muslim women actually feel suppressed and not just that they you think they should feel suppressed.

      Jerry

      Delete
    2. Bart;

      Would love to her your re joiner to my response.
      Jerry

      Delete