Monday, August 18, 2014

ARMCHAIR LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE FERGUSON CASE.

“Armchair” law enforcement is usually easy. The police should do this or they should do that; however, in Ferguson, Mo. with the racial tension admixed with gun control, police brutality, militarization of police, and the current political divide; for some reason it is a different story and should not be settled by an individual’s snap judgment. The situation has become more complicated every day and seems to be spiraling out of control. Like all complex things, it is best to dissect the problem into manageable components. When I tried to do this, I soon realized the problems require entirely different solution. Solutions to the short-term problems seem to make the long-term problems worse and visa versa. In addition, there are racist, black activists, right-wingers, and left-wingers all trying to take advantage of the situation. +Melissa Harris Perry and the inevitable self appointed minister  +Al Sharpton for example was milking it for everything it was worth to the point of sounding ridiculous on one side and +Fox News on the other side, sounding just as ridiculous if not more so doing the same thing. These people, with the help of the “media”, have turned it into a national political issue; Republican verses Democrat.  

The people involved in the immediate problem framed it as the “murder” of a “black” man by a white officer, while the man was on his knees with arms in the air begging for mercy. The armchair solution arrest and prosecute a law enforcement officer for murder. A segment of society frames the same exact situation as a law enforcement officer doing his duty by stopping and killing a dangerous criminal who resisted the officer. That officer’s act was justified, and that officer should be honored for risking his life “daily” in protecting society: The news media adds fuel to the fire by showing the now dead person robbing a store of cigars. Responsible journalists point out that the law enforcement official was not aware that the person on his knees in front of him was that criminal. The media, lawyers, and activists talk about the parents as never being able to hold their willfully murdered, college bound child, lovingly in their arms. On the law enforcement side, they describe the exact same person, not as a child but as a dangerous adult criminal. They say that the police officer has to deal with criminals who are black on a day-to-day basis implying that all black people are criminals; therefore, he did not have to know it was that man specifically to turn him into a criminal.


In the background, we have the United States the land of justice for all. That is what a trail and judgment by a jury of peers all about; it is rational way of dissecting complex problems into their component parts. In a proper trail, everything I talked about counts. Parents sentiment surrounding a child’s death, societies right to feel safe, the rights of law enforcement official of self preservation, the racial biases, the politics at the local and the national level, the necessity of doing something quickly, the media influences; everything counts but it is all mellowed by the judgment of time and investigation, which are the great equalizers. The very thing that makes mob rule so wrong and a trail by jury “so right” is exactly what is “so wrong” with armchair law enforcement; a trail by jury based on facts takes time. Do not allow your lack of patience to turn society into a police officer with a gun, which may be right or may be wrong; we should be right.  


URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated

No comments:

Post a Comment