#Chuck Todd interviewed Rep. Paul #Broun (R) of Georgia on
the telephone this morning (MSNBC). Broun is now a candidate for Senate from
that state but from what he was saying, he could have been from my state of
North Carolina. Todd asked him if he was a #Tea Party Member. His response was
an emphatic yes; no surprise there. However, what I found remarkable about his
response was his justification for belonging to the Tea Party. He is well known
for his outlandish pronouncements: the CDC is a plot by the government to force
people to eat what they don’t want to eat; the big bang is a theory right out
of hell, and climate changes is caused by dinosaur farts, are just a few of the
possible idiotic examples. It really makes one wonder how it is possible people
in Georgia vote for this man to represent them. Is it possible that the people
in that state believe what him? In his bio on the internet he claims to be one
of them; he is a graduate of the University of Georgia, to my knowledge that is
something that institution has not denied.
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com
Comments Invited and not moderated
He went on to say he believes in the Constitution, he believes
in small government; he believes in states rights; and he believes the
government is spending excessively. He tops off his lofty pronouncements with a
claim he supports “we the people”. He seems
not to realize the inherent conflict in what he his saying; the Constitution is
what creates the Federation of States and gives the power to “all” people. The Constitution
is there to establish a “more perfect” union, insure justice, domestic
tranquility, and equal opportunity for all. Does he not realize that power to
tax is there to provide for the people to do things they cannot do for
themselves: armed forces, environmental protection, safe health care practices,
emergency management, and public education and on and on. Does he not know that people in rich
states pay more than their share so people in poor states have “equal” opportunity?
Does he not realize the Constitution says by working together—all 330,000,000
of us—that we can all live the good life?
I do not understand the Republican aim. I especially have
problem with a guy like Broun saying “we the people” in conservative and plantation
south code when he means something entirely different. What do they intend for “we
the people” to achieve by cutting taxes more and more? What does “living the
good life” mean is it does not deal with “quality of life”? What does equality
mean quality of life? The only conclusion possible is that when the Constitution
say equality of opportunity for all it really means “equality of the quality of
life” for all of us or as near as we can achieve that ideal; happiness,
contentment, health, and security; the freedom to enjoy life.
No comments:
Post a Comment