Wednesday, April 16, 2014

RUMINATING ON INDIVIDUALITY

Sometimes it is difficult to appreciate how America is changing. The changes are deep, pervasive, and taking place at lightening speed. The changes are not physically but cultural. We are building these things on a genetic framework or foundation, which makes me wonder if we will be capable of coping with them in the not to distant future.

In the last 24 hours, a number of events happened in my life. Nothing unusual or startling, just normal everyday events. I attended a “family” gathering at an upscale restaurant. Several of my children, grand children, and great grand children attended. Think about that. As a child, our family did these kinds of gatherings at home or at a picnic grounds. The food would have been “potluck”, with everyone chipping in to make there favorite dishes. I can never remember when I attended a gathering as a child when there were great grand children in attendance; in contrast, this time it was a wonderful thing that my wife and I had five of them there. We were active participants in the conversation and not just setting with nodding heads and drool running out of the corner of our mouths and a rare great grandchild placed on our lap for a picture.

We ordered food. The amount of food served made the plates look small; ridiculous amounts and generated comments about how good they looked. The drinks were varied and, except for beer, were bottomless. Each dinner was different and had an exotic name—and taste. Everything was perfect; the food, the service, and the servers provided bags and multi compartmented Styrofoam containers provided for us to take home the excess; obviously, this was expected because they were so readily available without question. Everyone agreed, “This is a great restaurant!” The crowd in the place verified the fact that this is what the people want. In addition, the fact that there was hardly a person in sight that was not overweight to some degree.

I have a friend who is a veterinarian and owns a clinic but us retired. When I asked how many veterinarian she has working for her in the clinic, she answered four. Then she added that none of them worked full time. They are all females and have families. Of course, they could work fulltime but this is the new option, the new flexibility. When I went through veterinary college there was only one female in my class, none in the class before mine and none in the class after mine, now veterinary classes are 80% females.

Earlier in the day, I had received a very disturbing e-mail from a friend who described what he saw as the demise of “his company”. The nature of his disappointment related to pride of workmanship. As a boy, I can clearly remember craftsmen, who took serious pride in the quality of their work and the reputation of the businesses where they worked. My friend, as a long retired manager of that company, he spoke with the personal pride of his association with the company and the pride he had in the products of that company. That company downsized and had recently “expanded” into a state where corporate taxes were cut to zero—stockholders are supposed to ignore the conflict between the words ‘expanding” and ‘downsizing’. The company transferred the jobs but not the employees. The new “enlightened” company operators offered midcareer employees, who had worked their way into high paying jobs, the opportunity to reapply for their old jobs—at starting level—of course they would have to pay for a move across the country. Management were willing to exchange years of experience for low salaries by sending the jobs were sent overseas; the cost of correcting mistakes in engineering would be recovered by repeating the work until they got it right.

When I was a small boy, the people in this country were proud to be Americans and proud of our democracy. We took pride in our civility and respect for the law. There was a true belief in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and one-man one-vote; we believed our representatives represented us and if they didn’t, we could vote them out of office. Of course, there were bitter political divides but they were all respected government. The slavery issue divided this country but that was one government against another government, not scattered individual rebelling against the concept of authority of any kind—that can only lead to absolute anarchy or chaos. A rancher in Nevada is herald as a hero for not paying for pasturing his cattle on federal lands; he denies the authority of the federal government. He is a theft and a criminal. People with guns have showed up to support him; however, his supporters depend on the law and order as he does in their daily lives.


We function on greed, yet realize we must share; we are a gregarious species but have great pride in our independence; and we as individual have self esteem but relies on others for their admiration. We are living longer but are clinging on to an inherent life pattern. We are biological male and females but refuse to recognize the social reality of that fact. We know about “pecking order” but seem to think that we can all be at the top, which perhaps explains why we demand to be individuals because that is the only each one of us can be at the top. 


URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated

2 comments:

  1. Hi again. I've been reading through your posts. I see you're still swinging away at the R team. Where are all the comments at? I would think some rep from the R team would respond to you. It seems perhaps that people are unwilling to publicize their inability to spell. Well, I'm not too proud. I'll misspell my way through any of my theories. However, there would be more dimensionality to this content if more voices joined in. You there! RESPOND! ... crickets.

    I like what your are doing. I think that you are still extremely one sides in your attacks on the R team (read that blistering commentary on Charlie Krauthammer). You know well by now I blame both teams as well as their benefactors (billionaires) for the economic distress of our country... I know... you see it as the work of just he Koch brothers. Fine. At least you see 1/2 the problem. So many folks don't see a problem at all. I guess it is all relative. BTW, we are not a democracy... let's get that straight. We are, at best, a republic (ruled by representatives of the citizen body) and more realistically and unofficially a cleptocracy.

    I'm not sure what specific point you are trying to make in this post.. maybe just musing. I couldn't help picking up on that comment you made about the rosy past when we were all fed homogenized versions of history and news and we maintained that sunny warmth that all was good with our leaders. It is always a jolt to the newly educated student that encounters actual facts about our past and present leaders. Well, that said, maybe some skepticism about the motives of our present leaders is warranted... especially given the economic trend for billionaires verses the rest of us.

    That "tattooed faced punk" rancher must have fallen on the south side of your north pointing moral compass needle. You've recognized him in two posts. I do agree with you but I'm not sure I would have elevated him to the level you have. I mean, if I needed a poster boy for thief'n gun-toting lowdown pasture robbing no-good I might consider referring instead to Bernie Madoff.

    Sorry, that's all I have time for. As always, been fun.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I too wonder where the comments are.
      About being one sided, I am. About the Koch brothers, being ½ the problem, I respectively disagree; as I have explained. Big donor to democrats give to Democrats and Republicans give to Republicans; however, Koch brothers give to undermine democracy; see their platform. Perhaps, you should read Goodwin’s book to understand the conservative wing of the republican party at least that is what I would like it to be.
      As the title says, there is no real point, it was just me ruminating. The thing revisionist histories miss, it the way it turned out; for example, it even took a war to shed ourselves of slavery but we still have Jeffersonian racial prejudices. It took trust busting to bring certain industries into control but they are coming back. By the way, Madoff is the 21st century version and Rancher Bundy is the 18 century version of the same thing.

      Delete