Some conservatives seem to have problems talking about women.
Over the past 50 or so years, conservatives bunch this social issue with the
standard economic issues in the context of the Republican Party; thus, the
attitude toward women has become a political problem. There is a distinct
difference between conservatives and liberals. These dynamics are consistent
with my contention that our political beliefs are genetic.
Mike Huckabee
recent raise eyebrows with some carefully prepared remarks about women’s
attitude toward sex. Other Republicans have done the same thing in the past; legitimate
rape, etc. To use an old trope, these remarks are just the tip of the iceberg. George
Lakoff, a cognitive linguist, explained the basis for this in his book, Moral Politics: How Liberals and
Conservatives Think. He chose to couch his discussion in terms of moral
values but it really referenced the evolutionary psychology basis of our politics.
Moral values of any kind result from humankind’s reasoned interpretations of the
fundamental basis of right verses wrong in a sense of survival of the fittest. We
are what we are both physically and behaviorally because it is the way we evolved.
Part of Darwinian adaptive selection or “natural selection” relates
to social structure, which arise out of individual selection. Herds, flocks,
families, or kin groups have structure related to hierarchy dominance. This
gives rise to our individual as well as group competitiveness. We have political
parties; Democrats and Republicans, which obvious means there is something different
between the two groups. As Lakoff used the term ‘moral order’ to explain, society
has evolved a sense of order that seems right or correct. Hierarchy dominance
historically is based on physical strength that has evolved over a few million
years into a combination of intellectual and physical strengths. In the bestial
family, the “moral order” was the father, the mother and the children. It was “morally”
correct that the wife is obedient and submissive to the husband and the parents
punished disobedient children until they comply with the wishes of the culture.
It was “morally wrong” not to punish a disobedient wife or child. Failing to do
so would result in a hierarchy of punishments in the form of expulsion of the
child from the family to expulsion of the family from society. It was all nice,
neat, and orderly until intelligence entered the picture.
I understand the term
‘conservative’ to mean unwillingness to change, but there should be some kind
of limit before we get to the cave men.
Apparently, we are in the process of changing from the primitive
bestial physical driven society to an intellectually driven or at least a combination
of intellectual and physical driven society; we call it the progressive or liberal movement. I listen to the Republican rhetoric
about family life and the “place” of women in society and see exactly what Dr.
Lakoff was saying. Liberal describe these things by using pejorative terms to describe
this behavior as treating women “like second class citizens”, and denying “them”
choice in reproductive health, and a “woman’s place” is at home taking care of
the children. When Christians look at the way Muslim men treat women, we in
America with distaste and frequently refer to the cruelty of their system. However,
if we care to look, we can find some of that same behavior in American churches
embraced by the Republican Party; Mike Huckabee is an ordained Southern Baptist
minister and according to the Huffington Post, constitutionally mandated “separation
of church and state” makes Rick Santorum want to throw up. Todd Akin, the originator of the famous rape
remark, earned a Masters Degree of Divinity from the Covenant Theology.
No comments:
Post a Comment