Since a friend brought it up, I have been mulling over the
labor relations situation with Boeing Corporations in Seattle, Washington. My
friend had been a high-ranking employee of that company for years and retired
many years ago. He speaks with pride of his relationship with that company and
speaks highly of that company and from all indications as an engineer, he was
very proud of their products—passenger aircraft. To outsiders such as me, it
appears that he suddenly and markedly changed his attitude. Truth be told, it probably
took a long time for his attitude to change. The question is why. What happened
to change a dedicated employee in to a skeptic?
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com
Comments Invited and not moderated
From reading newspaper articles and listening to TV
broadcasts, I come away confused about the internal affairs of what had been such
a huge successful company, from being a benevolent giant, to an enemy of their own
workers. The company administration by edict and in concert with various
government bodies that has passed laws have all but eliminated the part labor
unions play in company affairs. This elimination of labor influence did not
happen overnight; it took years starting with Reagan’s firing of air traffic
controllers. In addition to internal disruption of labor, company
administration has instituted outsourcing, eliminating the number of workers it
takes to build an aircraft aimed at and lowering costs. Boeing executives chose
to shift the labor to foreign countries where corruption and lack of manufacturing
jobs have lowered wages well below a living wage in the United States and prevented
the enactment of even the most basic labor laws, such as taking advantage of child
labor, and also such things as having worker safety measures. Lack of costly pollution
control in these foreign places further lowers manufacturing expenses. Most notable, it also results in inferior products.
It is obvious that Boeing is not a unique company in terms of having bottom
line administrations—what I refer to as MBA-ism or educated to be greedy.
The efforts of big corporations have changed working government
policy in the form of so-called “Free Trade” agreements, written by big
corporations and forced by our own government down the throats of quid pro quo
foreign dictators made the associations with foreign governments even more
profitable for those companies. That has been our government policy since its
inception in 1776. I am quick to add that big business dictated our government
policy then and still does it now even after Teddy Roosevelt’s progressive
moves of the 1890’s. Those who follow this blog site know that I feel our current
President has been working very hard against fierce opposition from business to
change that negative image our policies have engendered in the world.
Big changes have happened at home in our states. Instead of
our example of greatness causing the world to improve, the opposite has
happened. The corruptions, pollution, disregard workers, and high product
standards in exchange for profits have gained ground in the United States. Being
a resident of North Carolina, I have seen a remarkable and wholesale shift in
the tax burden from industry to the people in the state in a matter of just one
year. In addition, our state government has also moved the cost of utilities
from “industrial giants” to the backs of individual homeowners. Deregulations
have opened our environment to gross pollution. In brief, the tragic story of our
state economics is a living history of shifting in income disparity. What is
alarming is that this shift in government policy has taken place creating a
number of “third world states”.
If we analyze what happened in North Carolina together with
what has happened at Boeing, we see a not very pretty picture; in fact, we see
a very ugly picture when we focus on worker loyalty to the companies that
employ them. North Carolina government has done what they have done in the name
of job creations. They want to attract companies to the state with low wages,
low taxes, and high profits—what they call a business friendly environment.
What they don’t say is that it is the worst of environments for the working
class; a labor hostile environment. What I just realized from the Boeing story
is that outsourcing jobs from Washington State to North Carolina, is that
outsourcing is now from state to state and not from country to country. The
economic situation has gotten so bad within the United States that one state
can treat another state as a third world country. The Republican controlled states
represent the third world. By moving a company such as Boeing form Washington
to North Carolina, the company is hurting U.S. workers—those who lost their
jobs in Washington and those workers they hire in North Carolina. The company has sacrificed any sense of
company loyalty for profits; there is a show on TV called America Greed that now defines Boeing.
New employees in North Carolina will never develop loyalty to a company that is
underpaying them, subjecting them to unsafe working conditions, to lack of job
security, and lack of pensions; unhappy workers do not produce quality
products.
W. James McNerney,
Jr. CEO of Boeing deserves to be in the hall of shame. He deserves a place
in the pantheon of company executives and politicians who have shifted the
pride of working for a company and doing a good job to a day-to-day wage. The greedy
64-year-old Harvard MBA who is head of this $81.7 billion corporation by
working against employees’ best interest has made 174,000 employees in over 70
countries and states within the U.S. disloyal and perhaps ashamed of whet they
do. It is notable that he has no aviation company experience in his background
before coming to Boeing in 2005; he has no love of aircraft or pride in the jet
liners the company produces. America
workers built this country on pride of workmanship not “love of money”. Unfortunately, CEO McNerney and Gov. McCrory
are not anomalies; the American people do not look at them, as they should as
two headed snakes or six legged frogs that result for polluted environments—they
are worse; they are MBA’s who pollute the environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment