Got a hair cut from a new barber. The young woman that had
been cutting my hair disappeared from the shop so I selected “the next one available”
option on the computer check in menu. To start a conversation, I asked if she
was from North Carolina. She proceeds to tell me that she grew up in a large family
on a small farm in Eastern North Carolina. She said her father was a hard working-man;
he even worked on Christmas day, which unusually means livestock of some type
are involved. She responded that inquiry by saying her father only had two sheep
and raised tobacco. Then she volunteered his political philosophy and presumably,
hers, “People who do not work should not be given anything”. Although she used
the passive voice, she was clearly referring to government welfare. As any
person who grew up on a small farm in a large family in North Carolina will
tell you, by comparison, everybody on welfare is lazy. She did not say it but
implied that her father never got a thing he did not work for, etc. I did not
to dissuade her as long as I was setting in her chair and she had the clippers held
at ready.
The persistent renouncement of people on welfare is a
central theme of Republican Party dogma peddled to the people who live in small
town on farms—conservative or Red State America and; perhaps the hardest working
but least economically rewarded people in the nations; the political opposites
of poor people living in urban America. Every Republican believes almost everyone
on welfare don’t need it or are outright cheats; Ronald Reagan, using welfare
Queen, turned the word ‘liberal’ in a slur.
Conservatives believe welfare recipients are on drugs; they
believe all liberals are on welfare and are somehow committing voter fraud to
elect Democrats to support them; they believe liberals want redistribution of
wealth; something beyond sharing of wealth through salaries and taxes. This
means people on welfare are living off someone else’s hard work: the taxpayer’s
dollars, which they go farther and translate that to mean if there is no
welfare, there will be no taxes. They tend to personalize it. In contrast to
themselves, who work hard for their money at great sacrifice to themselves—even
on Christmas Day, liberal are always looking for a free handout.
They only listen to frenzied Fox News Hosts, Glenn Beck, and
Rush Limbaugh or read only radical right-wing blog sites, each one telling the
next how bad it really is; the way liberals tramp on their rights; and it gets
worse in each telling. They end up in not a very nice place: an irrational hell
from which there is no logical escape. A place that requires drastic action such
as a nation wide effort to stop the cheating—second amendment remedies, the
right to protect them selves from Obama who is going to come and take their guns,
etc, which renders them vulnerable to these and other radical ideas including
racism, homophobia, anti immigration, and suppression of women’s rights. It
gets so bad those right wing pundits such as Anne Coulter believes that liberals
have some sort of mental disease.
The truth is that there is far less than 1% cheating on
welfare. The same is true of drug use by people on welfare as Gov. Scott of
Florida found when his company was making huge sums of menu testing anyone
applying for welfare. Every study ever done has shown that voter fraud is so
low it is nearly non-existent. Essentially none of what they believe is factually
true. You can tell them that and you can show them the statistics. They refuse
to believe the facts, apparently because everyone they talk to, everyone they
listen to, and everything they read is telling them they are right. To avoid an
irresolvable internal conflict they go with the flow. Obamacare is a case in
point. There is a 12% point difference in polling results when pollsters ask people
if they prefer Obamacare or Affordable Healthcare Act; they hate Obamacare but
see something good in Affordable Health Care.
The truth is different from what they believe; Republicans
hate the “nanny” government concept. They hate EPA but want a clean environment.
They hate FAA until they are in a plane. They hate FEMA until a hurricane puts
them on the street.They also hate seeing disabled people, wounded warrior, children,
and old people go hungry or without a home. They hate it but are willing to see
all of them suffer because less that 1% of are cheaters. They see nothing wrong
with “Coulter logic” when she says those homeless people should get up off the
grates they sleep on in the street of Washington D.C. and go to Harvard as she
did—it is true, she worked hard and never asked for anything. They can do the same
thing as she did, after all America the land of equal opportunity. If you think
all of this is dumbfounding, why not ask why people on welfare vote for Republicans?
Ask my new barber why she votes Republican
and she will carefully explain that she and her Daddy work very hard for their
money and do not want to give it away to welfare cheaters and perpetually pregnant
sex crazy single mothers, which is something that both Republicans and
Democrats agree on.
At one point in my engineering management career, a gentleman reported to me who was a Republican member of the State of Washington House of Representatives. He was a "moderate" (yes, they did once exist) and was a close associate of our Republican Governor, also a moderate. His avowed goal was to "clean up" the welfare mess in our state.
ReplyDeleteAfter 2 years in office, he confided to me that there wasn't a welfare mess after all, but there was an abysmal lack of state support for many truly needy families and individuals. He, with the support of the Governor, revamped the state welfare system by making it more responsive to citizen needs.
As you said Jerry, the cost of welfare is not the problem, the lack of adequate support in this time of great need is the true problem.