A guest on +Steven Kornacki’s show UP on MSNBC this morning
made an interesting comment that reminded me of a consistent Republican failure
in logic. +Raffi Williams, a member of the Republican National Committee, made
the comment almost in passing, as if it was an accepted truth; the establishment
of “health savings accounts” would have saved us from what he saw as the “evils
of Obamacare”. Remember the parallel idea
that privatizing social security would have saved the country from all the
evils of having old people living on Social Security. Although, I fail to see
what the evils of affordable health care and socials security really are, his message
was clear, all people should pay for what they get or they should not have it. The
underlying fallacy of this kind of thinking is so fundamental it is almost
embarssing to have to put it in writing. Yet, it is so fundamental it is worth
mentioning.
It sounds so right to demand that people pay for everything they
get; however, we know that everyone has to grow old and will reach a stage
where they cannot work. We also know that people get sick and need health care.
We know that people need to be educated and we know that society needs prisons
to defend us from each other, and we know that the country needs an army to defend
us other nations and ideologies. We need many things either the individual
could afford or that they cannot do for themselves even if they had the money. There
is another principle of government, which is that we all should collect taxes
to pay for what we need and for what we want the government to do for us; this
is sixth grade civics; this is how government works.
There is another principle, which is that everyone should
receive a fair day’s wages for a fair days work. We should define a fair days
wage as an amount of money that allows them to support themselves and their families,
pay health care, pay tuition, to save for retirement, and to pay taxes to run
the government. Republicans have done everything in their power to prevent this
from being the case across the range of society. Consider the minimum wage. The
Republican position is that the government should not raise salaries to a fair
wage; in fact, according to them there should not even be a minimum wage. Consider
taxes; everyone one should pay an equal amount of taxes as a low percentage of
income, which they call flat taxes. Consider education; everyone should pay tuition,
go to college, and get a good job. They cut State and Federal government
support for Universities, which forces colleges to raise tuition. Consider pensions,
everyone should save for their own retirement. People are living longer and longer
which would require well over a million dollars savings in the stock market to provide
a return on investment for a minimum living standard. The same problems exist with
health care. Republicans seem to deny the insurance principle when it comes to
health care. One day in the hospital cost more money that 99% of the people have
in their savings account, the same money they are saving for retirement. Everyone
needs insurance to make the cost affordable. In spite of this fact, they insist
that young health person should not have to pay for health insurance they “thinks”
they do not need; therefore, the cost of “free enterprise” insurance is out of
reach. In addition, they insist that free enterprise apply to healthcare, when
they know failed.
The bottom line is that the Republican world is an unreal
place. Wages are going down and expenses are snowballing. Instead of aiming to
make things better, every single political stance Republicans take they aim at
making things worse. They failed to learn simple civics in the 6th grade
but also they seem to have failed to learn simple arithmetic; they cannot add
savings for health care, saving for retirement, paying for transportation, to
the cost of education, food, and lodging and make it equal to the return from a
$7.50 per hour job. The sad thing is that not one of my Republican friends can
really afford to be a Republican—they cannot help themselves for their irrational
political views, which is why I insist that their politics must be in their
genes. If I am wrong, contact me and
explain otherwise.
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated
I agree entirely with you. Strong point made here about the callous prospect life holds for the increasing numbers of Americans who can't pay their bills. An economy with a strong middle class can sustain both the financial welfare to the rich and poor, however the numbers of those who actually carry the water buckets is diminishing and the reality is that demanding a fair wage only accelerates the rate at which corporations replace U.S. workers with foreign low cost labor. I don't understand how this is just a Republican sponsored issue. I'm sure that there are Republicans as well as Democrats who have experienced the awful pain of unemployment and foreclosure. All citizens have a stake in fixing this.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteSorry, as an afterthought, might it not be helpful if our government reps created protection for the nation's employed from foreign governments dumping their cheap labor into our markets? I believe that if a foreign government was dumping products that undermined the financial interest of any major corporation there would be a rapid response.
ReplyDeleteYou probably understand business better than I ever will but I do not see how a U.S. corporation dumps cheap products and labor on our market other than establishing a factor in china or Mexico and then sell the products on the U.S. market and then putting the money in a foreign account.
DeleteI doubt my understanding exceeds yours. A cheap pair of sneakers from China constitutes V pounds of raw material, W hours of labor cost, X cost factors from labor laws, Y amounts of pollution control cost, Z elements of transportation cost. As an aggregate cost to the sneaker company, the V is fixed. All the other elements, W through Z, are variable costs. I singled out the W hours of labor cost, but I also recognize these other cost reductions are available in countries that have much different laws than we do. As we choose as a nation to enact laws that promote safe work place, clean environment, minimum compensation and restrictions on worker's age, there is an imbalance created with respect to those countries who do not. So China, having the world's largest population has plenty of available and exceptionally cheap labor hours. Within the framework of our economy we cannot compete with this imbalance directly. Our government has no policy to address this imbalance that I'm aware of. In fact, China is a most favored trading partner to the U.S. since 2001, so this imbalance is embraced. Normal tools available to any country to guard against imbalanced trade (I called it labor dumping) is to enact tariffs. My understanding is that China maintains trade tariffs on U.S. products, for example electronic goods. This is done to promote the internal production of electronic goods in China. If it is proper for China to maintain a national economic policy to strengthen its economy, why then does the U.S. choose to not do the same? So my afterthought was that it might be helpful if our government reps created this protection to "balance" the trade equation.
DeleteAs I suspected you have deeper insight than I have. You ask a good question, Why do we (U.S.) not do as China does?
Delete