Sunday, August 25, 2013

TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF MARTIN LUTHER KINGS SPEECH

The Martin Luther King speech raised a question that had two diametrically opposed answers. What the conservatives heard that day 50 years ago, especially the conservatives in the Plantation South, was not what liberals heard. We have to focus on King’s speech because other speakers said different things. Some spoke in the same vain as King while other carried a different message. In other words, there was a mixed message; however, the actual message of Dr. Martin Luther King was clear even though they heard the same words, they did not hear the same message.

King called for affirmation of equal rights. He was asking, some say he was demanding that all men be treated equally. However, judging from their reaction, what conservatives heard was a call for black dominance. They prepared for rioting, a revolution with an attempt to overturn the government or something equally as sinister. When it didn’t happen they were puzzled. They were puzzled then and still seem to be puzzled 50 years later. This is not hyperbole; look at “peaceful” elections where GOP think they might lose the vote, they use the rhetoric of violence. Conservatives say, “If we don’t get our way, there will be real trouble” and they carry gun to political rallies. Can you imagine the impact of seeing tens of thousands of people standing in Washington against them? Had they been the minority, the one on the steps of the Lincoln memorial, it would have been a “lock and load” situation as Arizona Governor Jan Brewer says. Even under the Constitution that clearly calls for equal rights, it would be a call for a Second Amendment solution—some sort of macho tough guy stance.

An innate sense in the conservative mind is that there is a “natural order”. This sense applies to the structure in society wherever you find organization; in the family, in the neighborhood, in the work place, and in government; where ever hierarch dominance plays a part. Fairness means that one person, of course it has to be a conservative, is in charge and then there are the followers. Compromise means everyone has to agree with the leader, the boss, or the elect official. This is the only way their approach to politics makes sense with President Obama in the White House. The only way it is legitimate is if the President is a conservatives, nothing else can ever be correct. Without this understanding of innate conservatism, it is impossible to understand United State Politics. Equally, it is impossible to understand what conservatives heard what Martin Luther king said in spite of his actual words. George Lakoff wrote about how the innate feeling of moral order permeates everything conservatives think and do at length in his book The Political Mind.


In contrast, in the liberal mind, equality and sharing are paramount. This is what the majority of us heard Dr. King say. He was not calling for dominance; he was calling for equality. We will have inequality as long as we have conservatives. We will have two disparate answers to the question of what constitutes “proper” social order.  
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated

No comments:

Post a Comment