Sunday, August 18, 2013

SUCCESS OF FREEDOM OF THE PRESS IN AMERICA

This morning on +Steve Kornacki’s program Up on MSNBC, Steve and the four guests discussed reporters and reporting. +Eleanor Clift, one of the guests made a remark that I though was telling. She said something along the line of, ‘what reports report has to be verifiable’.  In a real sort of way, that would make reporters like scientist. It implies a standard for journalism that does not exist today. There seems journalistic standards have been compromised; innuendos and nuances seem to be printed by news organizations more often them facts. In some cases, newspapers, and TV stations even permit broadcasting down right lies; in some case, under a by-line—no shame.

In the scientific world, scientist publish the results of their work with the intent that the data can and will be verified by other scientists. They even publish the techniques the used to obtain the information. If the information is not verifiable, the scientist reputation can be ruined even if his or her intentions were honorable.  In the worst-case scenario, if the scientist based his report on falsified data, the scientist will never be able to publish anything in the future. The public should hold reporter to the same standard. They should be able to go to the same sources or to other sources and find out the facts. If the media organization cannot be verified a news story the reporter should not only loose his or her job but also his or her career.

Of course, “reporters” report many actual events; however, they so often embellished the stories with personal opinion, it is sometimes difficult to figure out where the truth is. Journalism standards have deteriorated to a very low level; a flourish of inflated, colorful, and vivid descriptions of actual minor events seem to be the only verifiable stories one can read or hear. I can remember old-time reporters talking about lying down and have someone cover them with a sheet so a news photographer can take an attention-getting picture of a dead body. False yes, but true in a sense it was showing a “body” where there actually had been a body. I find that different from reports about “welfare queens” as happened on a news special about cheating or stories about voter fraud in North Carolina. The recent stories in Lewiston, Maine about a tough sounding “crack down” on rampant welfare cheaters in this town of 37,000 people is a classic example.  The police arrested six of them—.04% hardily justifies the word ‘rampant’; all you have to know to understand the thrust of the reports is to know there are 5,000 Somalis living in that town, something you would never learn from reading the story.  

I have no idea of how many news stories a “truth in reporting organization” can verify and how many they cannot but my guess is that most will not be verifiable, which is really a sad commentary the success of freedom of the press in America.  As some wise old head once said, freedom is like your money; you are free to spend it but once you have spent it, it is gone.  


URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated

No comments:

Post a Comment