There seems to be an innate human tendency to want to be
bigger, to expand or want more. There is never enough. This tendency seems much
more inclusive than what psychologists refer to as hoarder syndrome. It cannot
be that simple; like a little old lady with a house so full of boxes she can
not move. Nevertheless, when subjects like this arise, sometimes it helps to
look for mental disorders where the trait in question is isolated. Hoarder
syndrome or insane accumulation of “things” is sometimes treated as part of the
OCD complex, which only makes it harder to define.
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com
Comments Invited and not moderated
Less than insane hoarding seems universal in the sense that
it applies to children and adults as well a personal attributes such as body
size, un-ownable property such as the earth, or to intangible things as members
of an organization or group. I see Arnold Schwarzenegger or a person with
massive amounts of money in a Swiss bank account, in the same light as a land-poor
Texas rancher. They all have excesses, they all feel they deserve it, they all
worked hard for it, and they all own it but none of them feel that it is too
much.
A person who owns a store or business of some kind wants to
expand, if not to expand the size of one store then to own more than one store.
If they belong to a club, they want to increase the membership. If they live in a town, they want to increase the
population. If they own a massive business such as one of the biggest airline
companies, they want to buy all the small companies but also the other biggest airline
company: US Airways and American
Airlines. The potential merger of
major airlines stimulated this post. In my mind the questions loom, “Who would
want to own or control the biggest airline in the world and why?” Unfortunately,
I think the answer is everyone. It has a primitive base. In the bestial world, hoarding
is akin to survival limited by storability. There is no genetically adaptive limit
short of the time and work involved. Of
course, clever man has devised money, which does not rot but corporations do
not rot either.
People from all social strata engage in mission creep. Watch
people install property fences or university presidents expand campuses and build
buildings even when the number of students in need of an education is not sufficient
to justify the expansion. Armies commonly engage in mission creep by going from
fighting wars to nation building. I assume most people living in New York City
do not want to see the city get bigger. However, the city officials do not seem
to agree; they work hard to attract more business. People with immense fortunes
become philanthropists but no one can tell us how much money is so much they
start to give it away. Accumulations seem without limits, like hoarders; however,
most people recognize when they have enough.
In addition to possession, there is an accompanying tendency
to keep control of what they have, which fits in with inborn hierarchy dominance
or peck order but the “bigger is better” seems to be a different trait. Even a
person with a small amount will fight to keep what little he or she has. I have
a tendency to think greed is involved in all of this but how can a feeling of greed
justify a fight to the death over a broken jack knife between street homeless
people. Certainly, greed is involved as well as hierarchy dominance if they truly
are distinct traits; the tangible material things verse intangible power.
Is there something in Adam Smith’s invisible hand to justify
owning it all—to justify monopoly? I think not. If I own all the coconuts and
bananas, it makes no difference how many bananas it takes to buy a coconut. The
end-point of the game Monopoly is to end up with all the money. Why? Is trying
to own the biggest airline in the world a form of insanity? Did you know that hoarding is almost impossible
to treat?
No comments:
Post a Comment