ZIMMERMAN WAS SCREAMING FOR HELP

This George Zimmerman trial has revealed a loophole in our jury trial system.  Zimmerman’s attorney has paraded a long series of witnesses before the jury. Each in turn has declared that the voice screaming for help on the 911 call was that of the defendant. First, the defense attorney has cleverly allowed distortion of the meaning of the screaming heard on the 911 phone call. Just because a person screams does not mean he or she did or did not pull the trigger of the murder weapon, which is what the public and especially the jury has been erroneously lead to believe.  Even his parents falsely believed the voice was there son because if it were it would somehow exonerate their son. The distortion of logic was that because Travon was beating the defendant; which, judging from the condition of Zimmerman’s nose, he was; the defendant did what he did in self-defense; therefore, Travon “caused his own death”. As an aside, Zimmerman’s defense attorney uses this exact phrase repeatedly for its utility in shifting blame. The truth about the screaming more than likely means the opposite; the screamer was so scared that he would go to any length to save himself—even kill another human being; the screamer was George Zimmerman.

The second judicial mistake is that the judge allowed a series of Zimmerman’s friends to testify that the voice heard on the 911 phone call was that of Zimmerman. Although, it was Zimmerman screaming, the truth is that the witnesses were lying; in the context of a jury trial, they were committing perjury: they were intentionally lying to save their friend. The reason I can make such a bold statement is that everyone, including the parents, Zimmerman’s friends, and TV viewers know the voice was indistinct; therefore, clearly not identifiable. Yet, Zimmerman’s friends declared that there is no mistake, they were 100% sure, and it was the voice of their friend George. Somehow, they can identify a voice no one else can, including a PhD in sound technology, which means the witnesses are lying. However, they are safe from perjury charges because no one can prove they are lying, and that was Judge Debra Nelson’s mistake; she allowed “opinion” to be testimony—improvable perjury—that is a loophole large enough to drive through a truckload of injustice. 

URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated