A new argument in the abortion debate makes the front page.
I do not mean to imply it is a good argument; I just mean that it is new. The
few women of North Carolina are arguing that they want to prevent abortion to protect the safety and health of the
mother. Out of context, it sounds like a good argument. However, the
legislation being argued is prevent insurance companies or using taxpayer money
from paying for abortions and to close all, not just most but all clinics,
where abortions are done and to prevent women from having an abortion in hospitals
or doctors offices. In other words, they are forcing women into resorting to a
very unsafe procedure, which is the exact opposite of what they are arguing. They
should be forcing women who want abortions into the safe environment of
qualified hospitals and not into back alleys. They should be asking forgiveness
for all the harm they have already done.
Does it not dawn on them that women want and need abortions to
shed themselves of unwanted and unhealthy conceptus, or to protect their own lives?
Does it not dawn on them that they are usurping the women’s right to decide her
quality of life issues? Obviously, it is blatant intrusion by Republicans on
some one else’s privacy. In addition, they are arguing that protecting their own
health, quality of life, and even their own life is morally wrong. There has to
be a touch of socio-pathology involved; how can the Republican women who argue
this way suddenly shed themselves of compassion and empathy.
When we look at the driving force for abortion we see the “church”,
that is what some refer to as the bastion of morality. How can it be that
people who wear collars backwards are asking women to suffer unspeakable suffering
and horrors in the name of morality? Women who all of their lives they have taught
the church is the most important thing in their lives but if they decide against
church doctrine and try to protect themselves and their quality of life, they
will be excommunicated from what they have been taught to worship. They call
this morality. It is not; it is down right cruel; therefore immoral.
Perhaps the church vs. morality argument is too esoteric for
some in the Evangelical world we live in. So let’s look at the “real” pragmatic
argument. Gov. Pat McCrory of North
Carolina lied his way into office by saying he would not support any change in the
abortion laws. The state legislature passed a motorcycle safety law that closes
all abortion clinics. As a liberal, I do not understand the connection. I guess
conservatives think doctors somehow use motorcycles to perform abortions. Anyway,
the governor nullified his promise to veto the law because it is no longer an abortion bill but a bill to
protect women’s health. He hasn’t sign it yet but he will. It is moral to
intrude on women’s quality of life but not moral to lie to be elected to the
governors office.
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com
Comments Invited and not moderated
No comments:
Post a Comment