This morning on
Morning Joe (MSNBC), +Donny Deutsch made a telling observations, a reminder
really, business executives who commit crimes are not subjected to criminal
charges. The reference was to JPMorgan jacking up energy prices to gouge the
public. The Federal Government found out what they were doing, charged the company,
and the company had to pay a fine—end of story. The point of this post is that
the fine is treated as the end of the story when it shouldn’t be.
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com
Comments Invited and not moderated
The remark made
by Deutsch point out the fact that someone in that company engaged in criminal
activity to boost company profits. If we examine who that executive(s) was, something
the public will never be able to do, I am sure we would find a person with an
MBA, high paid, received accolades and even a bonus for doing what he did. He
or she would have been look at as a hero within the company; “the kind of person
you would want on your team”. Look at the Mitt Romney example; the business community
looks at him and his vulture capital company as “champions of good business”
based on one thing, the bottom line. They wanted to reward him with the presidency.
There is a serious disconnect between the common people and the “royalty” of business
world. Is dismissing criminal activity part of the deference they expect
society to give to them?
Obviously, by stereotyping
I have just committed a crime of reason. I often think about the French Revolution
with the turning society upside down. All those who were “eating cake” guillotined
all royalty; they were killed because they were royalty as if everyone associated
with the crown were guilty; that of course is not true. What I am saying is
that by bringing criminal charges against those who are actually guilty, we as
a society can defuse building social unrest. We cannot throw up our hands and
say business corruption is so pervasive we can do nothing about it, which is
precisely what Donny Deutsch said in condensed form is happening.
The problem for
society is even if a few people are charged; the corrupt mental attitude reaches
into lower levels of business society and into the halls of academia in the
form of MBA’s—bottom line sans morality. The guilt reached into the recesses of
lesser offices and into the minds of aspiring executives as well as into the
halls of congress, and many guilty and “near guilty” go unpunished. Case in point
was Enron in 2001. The few criminal types in the executive suites of several associated
corporations caused many people to suffer. As an example of the far reach of
the Enron problem, all of the people of California faced huge artificially increases
in energy charges, the “people of that state, recalled a setting Democratic governor,
Gray Davis, and a Republican was elected governor. Need I remind you that California
is a huge state and Enron was just one company. The people of a legislative
district in California elected an advantage taker and instigator of the political
unrest, +Darrell Issa, to congress—an extremely bad legislator.
The fact that some
at Enron were charged and punished had a positive effect; however, as +JPMorgan
case, and many, many more, shows that we are having trouble charging even the
most guilty. We need a Democratic congress
and an aggressive +Elliot Spitzer, +Elizabeth Warren, and +Eric Holder, and above
all else we need +Barack Obama. We need Glass-Steagall, Dodd-Frank, an honest
Supreme Court, and much, much more. Above
all else, we need a working class that knows they are in trouble. The one good
thing about predicting the future is that it has not happened yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment