In terms of Guantanamo, suddenly, we are willing to put ten
innocent people in jail just to confine one guilty one. That was one of the
evils of the Bush administration—one of the civil rights we were willing to give
up. Our society houses an element of people who are not willing to suffer
through what I call the “Dukakis Phenomenon”. The reference is to a weekend prisoner
furlough program, which was in force in Massachusetts while Michael Dukakis was
Governor; he was running for President and supported the program. They released
Willie Horton, a convicted murderer, who committed other horrendous crimes,
which served as the centerpiece of a devastating political ad. This same element
of society stands ready to condemn anyone—but especially President Obama—willing
to release people accused of terrorism because of the danger of that person
committing an act of terror. They would set in the background waiting to attack
politically if one of these people were to be involved in an “act of terror”.
In the above sentences, I was careful not to write “another”
act of terror. Some of the prisoners are in Guantanamo and have been there for
11 years because there was a $5,000 reward offered by the Untied States to turn
in suspicious people in Iraq. There is absolutely no evidence that they are
guilty of committing an act of terror in the first place. In a war-torn, poverty-stricken
nation, bounty hunting was an easy way to earn a “small fortune”. This happened
time after time.
In addition to the fact that a free trail would reveal the
shame of this program, they would release those not guilty of being enemy
combatants simply because they were not guilty. However, if I intentionally wanted
to radicalize an innocent person, that is teach them to hate America, I would put
them in prison for 11 years. If they weren’t terrorist before they were
arrested (captured) they would then have good reason to be terrorists. If we release
them and they bomb or terrorize our embassies do we just shrug our shoulders
and forgive them.
Who constitutes “this element” of society that is casting
such a dangerous shadow over our treasured judicial system? It is my contention
that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, Lindsey Graham and John McCain, Michael McCual
and Peter King are not good for America. I think their behavior is innate, it reflects
what is in their genes. They are Republicans. They are selfish. Their sense of
personal safety overrules their sense of humanity. This is selfishness and not altruism.
Sadly, their selfishness has created great danger or all of us. What is gloomy
is that they cannot fundimentally change how they think; we can only hope they
can learn.
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated
No comments:
Post a Comment