If there is one thing that made clear by the primary and
election campaign, it is that Romney is
just not presidential material. I judge the man based on his responses to
questions and how he handles himself in different situations. It is clear how
he succeeded in business and how he would fail as president. His focus is very
narrow and he is the center of it—everything he does is for his own personal good.
A president has to have a broad
understanding of the world and, by definition, have concern for the common
good. This assessment is based on him personally and not an assessment of
his political philosophy. Of course, I abhor his politics of individualism. I rejected
John McCain based on his politics but I am rejecting Mitt Romney based on both his
personality and his politics.
He changes his position faster than a chameleon changes colors. He wants the person he is talking to like
him and thinks the way to achieve that aim is to agree with them. It works well
if you are a businessperson trying to sell something, but presents a problem
when talking to a women’s group in the morning then to a bunch of evangelical
ministers in the afternoon. In either case, it is like trying to sell raw meat to
vegetarians. It calls into question his
relationship to his church. How can a vulture capitalist, who goes to church
every week and church leaders tell him to “do on to others as you would have them
do onto you,” not heed what he hears?
To address him directly about his donations to that church; Mitt, no amount of philanthropy
will excuse the way you earned the money you donate. You cannot buy your way
into heaven nor can you buy your way into the white house—at least I hope you
can’t.
Agreed, But he and the other Republicans will still try. The party needs to take less extreme and engage in more compromise...alas
ReplyDeleteA Republican compromise is to ask for 100%. The Democrat compromise to 50%. The Republican again ask for 100%. The Democrats compromise to 75%. There is a great word 'iteration'. When the Democrats object to compromise they are the obstructionist or have you never heard the expression "Democrats will not work across the aisle" even at 87.5%. A Grover Norquist compromise is a Hobsons choice.
ReplyDelete