Why is it that the President’s team and even President Obama
seem not to understand the Bain Capital problem? Capital is vital to a private
entrepreneur. A big company that is making millions already does not have to
worry about where the developmental dollars are coming from. There is no way a
backyard inventor can compete with the industrial giants with out access to
capital even if it is costly—it is a risky business. That is why honest venture
capital can be so profitable but also why capital is so important to the
American way of life. That was not Bain. What is wrong with Bain Capital under
Romney’s leadership is that he used private capital to take over ailing
companies. If his objectives were to build the company up and put it on the
road to success would have been one thing; it would have been admirable. If he
failed, he could say at least he tried.
However, what he did was use his knowledge of business to evaluate the
company in terms of what he could do to make money any way he could—ethically
or unethically, which is not the same thing as legally verses illegally; this
is tied directly Romney’s stance on government regulation deregulation. He
often, but not invariably, chose an unethical and solution, which in my mind
means to hell with people; his bank account was what counted. If he couldn’t
make money honestly ethically, he did it his way. This is called predatory
capital and not venture capital.
Firetree is dedicated to analytic discussions of issues from the liberal point of view.
Monday, May 21, 2012
BAIN CAPITAL: VENTURE OR RAPTOR
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment