Friday, August 29, 2014

ARAB NATIONS LACK FOUNDING FATHER EQUIVALENT

Chris Matthews was the guest on Morning Joe (MSNBC) this morning. It isn’t often one hears something new about politics but this morning was different for me. After some banter about Joe Scarborough rudely interrupting him, which he always does to guests, Chris prevailed, he held to the thought he was addressing. It was that thought that I found so interesting. I have been unwavering in my support of advancing democracy in the Arab world; that is what the objective of Arab Spring.  I have been quick to compare what is happening in all those Arab countries to our own tumultuous beginning, which was the creation of the concept of one-man one-vote.  In the Arab world has a big looming divide based on religious affiliation that dominates the entire scene: Sunni verses Shia with some Christian involvement. Our founding fathers rejected the religious issue with a simple concepts summarized in the phrase “separation of church and state”. This was possible because our infant federation had so many other overriding issues dividing the states, referenced mainly in the Constitution, followed by issues dividing us as individuals referenced mainly in the Bill of Rights.


In the Arab nations we have allowed, and in a few case, demanded military dictatorships and caliphates shift power to the people; one-man one-vote. The eye-opening phrase used by Chris Matthews was “shift power of the government to the street”. I had never considered one-man one-vote or “democracy” in those terms. What these Arab countries do not have is a group of people we proudly refer to as our founding fathers. It was something Arab nations apparently do not have. This truly remarkable group of people provided leadership to counter many other interests including religious leaders. Therefore, we are asking these nations to become democracies, which they apparently want, but they have no organized “in country leadership”—no influential group that can act as founding fathers. With out such a group, we are asking the people “on the street” to form a government. The people envy our freedoms and us; they envy us for our economic system of free enterprise-socialism, but especially separation of church and state. The “people on the street” envy our Constitution and our Bill of Rights but have no idea how to reach their goal. 

URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated

No comments:

Post a Comment