Some people were terribly upset; Snowden revealed that National
Security Administration (NSA) has been snooping into our phone calls and
messaging. I think there is something sinister about all of this; not that NSA
was snooping into you private lives but that people were upset about it.
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated
Even though biologically fundamental, self-preservation may
be a difficult concept to get your head around because of myriad cultural
complexities involved. We want to protect ourselves from insult and damage of
all kinds ranging from insult to death threatening injury, and at all levels,
from all sources ranging from the natural environment to our fellow man, and in
society especially their fellow man; it is part of whom we are. We have an
innate (bestial) tendency to associate with others called gregariousness and
another innate drive to order or govern that association with hierarchy dominance,
equally indelible. Thus, we have woven all of that into society and government
and into our normal every day business. Sometimes even the most gregarious lose
track of the big picture and focus on them selves; it is selfishness. This is the
so-called libertarian, like Rand Paul, who thinks he can live like a hermit in
New York City. However, most rational people realize self-preservation is the
purpose of it all. It is why we do what we do.
With this in mind, we hardily have to ask what the purpose
of surveillance is. In addition, everyone understands that we organized our
government to protect us from “everything”. We have organized government to do
for us what we cannot do for ourselves; we do not even have to think about that—we
understand it. The question in modern society is what do we mean by the phrase protect
us from “ourselves”? What do we mean when we use the word sovereign:
independent, autonomous, self-governing. How can it be that we have to protect
ourselves from the government when we are self-governing? It makes no sense
until we understand that we as the “body politic” want to consider ourselves
sovereign but do not have a nice neat modern definition of the expression. How
can we apply the concept of libertarianism to diverse subunits of society? We
understand how tribes, states, or nations can be sovereign but individual are
still individuals. We also have the confusion introduced by huge massive private
corporations that have taken on individual identity as sovereign units: Google,
AT&T, Exon Oil, and American Express, for example.
There are those who would ask us to believe there is such thing
as a “body politic” for a corporation. The workers for a corporation are not looked
at as “the people of a nation, state, or society considered collectively as an
organized group of citizens”. To equate corporate employees to a “body politic”
definition seems inappropriate; “the people of a nation, state, society, or corporations considered collectively
as an organized group of citizens”. Making corporations people pits wealth of
corporations against wealth of individuals, which obviously give corporations a
huge, huge advantage.
What makes “corporate personhood” especially awkward is that
there is the inherent conflict. We cannot protect ourselves from corporations as
individuals; we need the collective power of society to do that, which is government.
Individuals are vulnerable to corporate wealth but recently corporate wealth has
reached a point where it can challenge our government’s wealth. There is no
better way to put this in perspective then to look at what is happening with
NSA surveillance; corporate information gathering verses government information
gathering. Credit card corporations know so much about us that they know when
our spending habits change. AT&T is were the NSA (government) has to go to
get telephone information, I blog in support of gun control and the National
Riflemen Association (NRA) posts an ad on my site offering a free knife to those
who become new members. If I write on an email saying I am going on vacation,
ads for vacations destinations, start appearing in my e-mail.
My point is that private corporations controlled by individuals,
those who voters have not control over, are
snooping into to every aspect of our lives for their economic advantage. Yet,
#Snowden, #Greenwell, and supporters in their ignorance divulge government
secrets—our secrets—they are the supporting corporation sovereign rights to
collect and misuse information over their own government’s rights. Again, this
means they support corporate rights over the rights of government. Ludicrous! When
the government is accused of having phone meta data records, even much less
information than most corporations, there a left wing uproar of #Chris Hayes
and #Rachael Maddow added to the ingrained right wing hate against the government.
The result is that everyone hates the
government, which is just exactly what corporate sovereignty requires for them
to complete their take over of what is intended to protect us from them. Restated,
the very people who cry the loudest about NSA surveillance are the ones who
support corporations’ rights to spy on us—them; they are the ones who hate the government,
and they are the tools of corporate money—the ones Koch brothers are leading
around by the nose. Sad indeed.
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated
No comments:
Post a Comment