Someone made the statement on Morning Joe (MSNBC) this AM
that Obama has lost credibility in his cry for war. I found that strange. Every time Joe Scarborough
or one of his sycophants mentioned Syria, they attached the word ‘war’. Mika also
said, “Our war weary nation does not want another war” thus piling the word on
top of itself.
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com
Comments Invited and not moderated
What they are saying is true; however, what they are not
saying is that what Obama is trying to do is restore American credibility
in the world. His administration is not
asking this nation or any other nation to go to war. He is asking the world
to punish al Assad for using a heinous weapon. Republican Presidents
and Democratic presidents alike have disenchanted the American people for so
long they do not believe them. The most recent, George W. Bush was the
most egregious. Now, when we have a president we can believe, they have trouble
accepting his sincerity. As sad as that is, I understand it.
The first hurdle Obama has to overcome is the belief by the rest
of the world that America will not do anything unless there is some form of economic,
territorial, or power gain. This is not a belief based on myth; it is based on
fact. Against the military industrial complex background, that is individuals within
the United States do profit from war, businesses also profit internationally from war at
the expense of many nations; cheap minerals, oil, labor, etc. For example, the Korea
war and the Vietnam War were fought to divide the world markets into yours and
ours, with “ours” being the biggest piece of the pie. Iraq was easiest to understand. Ambassador
Paul Brenner openly confiscated Iraqi business and their entire economy; at least
he tried to do that. He represented the
ugliest of the “ugly Americans in action”. Small wonder people do not believe Obama as an American when he
is says he is proposing a limited strike to punish al Assad and not a “boots on
the ground” invasion to take over Syria for American profit.
Even people like Chris Hayes do not believe the president. Hayes
is so far left he sounded ridiculous while trying to act tough when he
interviews people Like Secretary of State Kerry on his MSNBC show last night. He
used the cheap interview trick of suppose this or suppose that. “What if,” he
asked, “you strike Syria and they gas people again?” In one sense, he intended it
to be a “clever” trick question; he wanted to trap the Secretary into saying he
would expand the war, which is what everyone fears; as if this is the first
time Kerry has ever been interviewed. Kerry
did not respond as he should have by saying that America would be in a much better position for having tired and failed than
if we did nothing and al Assad gassed his people again.
As President Obama said in his news conference this morning,
the America people elected him to stop wars and not start them. Isn’t it sad that
American credibility is so bad around the world that no one believes our president.
Isn’t it sad when people accuse the president of losing his credibility for
asking our own Congress for permission to punish a severe moral crime—for doing
the right thing; for asking our government to work the way it should work.
If he were a Republican president, he would not ask Congress.
If such a president were elected, he would assume that the people had given him
the moral authority to decide—end of discussion. The fundamental premise of
innate Republicanism is grounded in the idea that the President is the authority
figure and the people are there to obey. That is the authoritarian model of
government. It is morally wrong not to obey. A progressive like President Obama
operates at a different level. He believes that the people have a say; that the
people elected him to act in a way that will benefit humankind. It is morally wrong
to disobey “the will of the people”. This is what he means when he said the people
elected him “to stop wars and not start wars”. The dilemma is that the people do
not believe him because they believed previous Presidents and paid a terrible
price. +George W. Bush’s blatant lies taught the world that even a United
States president, while claiming to be the moral leader of the world, would lie
to maintain what he and his neo-con advisers believed was correct “moral order”;
America as the leader and the rest of the world is to follow—out of fear and
not respect. Moral psychology is a
complex subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment