One of the mysteries I have encountered is why do NASCAR
fans hate Barack Obama. ‘Hate’ is a strong word and should be only be used for
personal acquaintances who pose a personal threat. It implies an association that
does not seem to be there. Why do people who enjoy watching cars drive around
in circles have such deep feelings? Why do they represent a unique subset of
the conservative mind set?
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com
Comments Invited and not moderated
Hate is an emotion. It is instinctual. Invariable, we can
trace instincts to our survival. Those with instincts survive and those who lack
instincts don’t. We don’t react to things by reason. However, when we try to
give reasons to explain the way we react, we make them up. Every person will
give a different reason for the same response but in the end, the instinct in
question must some how relate to survival. So the question really is how does
hating the government, Obama is their icon of government, related to their
survival.
I cannot trace their feelings back to anything I know about human
personalities other than authority, which has two sides; being “in charge”
verses not being in charge or giving order verses taking orders. Even that seems
wrong. When we try to equate the status of the president of the entire United States
with that of a racecar fan, it makes no sense—it is ridicules. If they “hate” anyone
who tells them what to do or not do, why didn’t they hate George W. Bush and Ronald
Reagan who ran much more authoritarian governments; telling subsets of people how
to behave, those who lost their jobs, old people, disabled veterans, and people
who were not successful, as undisciplined children. How can hating authority possible
work at any job with a supervisor? Therefore, that explanation makes no sense.
If it is true that Republicans “hate” government, then it
makes no sense that they fight like hell to be in charge of government. It is
like saying they hate a transgender queen because they want to be the first
transgender queen. Or, is it the tired old Vietnam Village Syndrome again; we
have to destroy it to save it and the best way to destroy it is to be in charge
of it. This also seems wrong; they are intelligent people and know that we need
government.
Maybe authority that tells them what to do is fine but “hate”
any authority that tell them what they cannot do is OK; authority they see as taking
away individual freedom. How does that thought apply to people who are fans of
drivers who only know how to drive counter clockwise? At least one or two of them should decide to
drive clockwise, just to defy authority; that would be exciting. The reason
they don’t is obvious. The all drive the same way to protect themselves from
one another, which could be a great racetrack metaphor for society in general.
They seem to be so self-centered that they do not understand
the purpose of laws. Perhaps, on the open road, they see highway speed limits
as being there as an affront to their freewill and not to protect people from
them; tantamount to driving clock wise. Motorcyclists don’t want to wear
helmets to protect taxpayers from paying high medical bills when they run their
heads into curbs. They don’t want gun regulations when they can buy assault
rifles to protect themselves. Apparently, they see all people owning guns in the
same light as all driving one way on a race tract. Not owning a gun would be
like driving the wrong way—to dangerous for them to even contemplate.
Almost as an aside, they willingly were helmets in race cars.
Why? Is it because one of their own told them they must? If that were the case,
would they call it a law? If it was a law, would they “hate” Brian France the
owner of NASCAR? Is it voluntary? Did
you know that one of the first things the North Carolina legislature did when
the Republicans took over that body was to pass a law that said for adults, wearing
helmets while riding a motor cycle, was voluntary. Should I “hate” Gov. McCrory
for not passed a law to protect the North Carolina taxpayers from paying high
medical costs for head injuries of those who were not wearing a helmet? NASCAR
politics, especially its intensity, is beyond my comprehension.
No comments:
Post a Comment