I routinely watch
Steve Kornacki’s show Up on MSNBC on
Sunday mornings. This past Sunday I notice how intently one guest watches the
other guest when they are talking. Their attention is so intently focused on
the talker that it calls attention the fact that they are doing it, especially
when the guests are setting next to one another. This made me recall a book I
read sometime ago.
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com
Comments Invited and not moderated
I found a book What the Dog Saw by Malcolm Gladwell (Little
Brown and Co, New York, 2009) on my book shelve put there by my wife and one of
my daughters over a year ago. As often happens, I ran out of things to read so
I picked it up. The content pleasantly surprised me but especially the title
essay, which was What the Dog Saw: Cesar Millan
and the Movement of Mastery. This essay
was about a remarkable individual who has remarkable ability to communicate
with dogs. I had watched his TV Show, which I think some National Geographic producer
called the Dog Whisperer, a knock off title from the famed Horse Whisperer, a
man who could communicate with horses. The author talked about a range of
people including anthropologists and professional dancers who analyzed Cesar’s facial
expression and movements and they collectively agreed that he communicates with
dogs by his body movements as well as his facial expressions. He has honed an
innate talent into a skill.
Psychologists
have studied emotions and facial expression associated with them. It turns out
that is strong evidence that facial expressions and the seven emotions are universal,
like universal cultural traits. There are seven emotions that have associated the
universal facial expressions of seven emotions—anger, contempt, disgust, fear,
joy, sadness, and surprise. There is scientific evidence that dogs can “read”
human facial expressions and interpret body movement. Nuanced in the writing was
the implication that dogs an I assume other animals such as cats and horse, can
read subtleties in these expression—micro expression—not only human expression
but also expressions made by each other.
Psychologists
have studied this phenomenon and discovered these micro-expressions. can last
for as short as 0.5 seconds but often much longer. Two scientists, +David Matsumoto
and +Hyi Sung Hwang, have published some of this information (+Psychological
Science Agenda: May 2011) and have put together a class where they teach people
how to refine the “reading” these expressions.
Because of my interest
in evolutionary psychology, it fascinated me to see this information discussed
from several points of view. Of course, the obvious is that emotions are genetic
should be accepted as fact and should be taken as evidence of the validity of
evolutionary psychology as a science. In addition, that reading emotions is universal,
adds credibility to it being innate. That reading emotion and body movements is
innate in humans, dogs and horse and presumable other animals, means the ability
is genetically well conserved. Together, this means it is adaptive behavior resulting
from natural selection; therefore, contributed to survival in some meaningful
way.
The rapt
attention one guests on Steve Kornacki’s show pays to another means to me that they
are subconsciously using their innate ability to interact with each other. It
is subconscious because it is highly unlikely that the guests have taken the
class in micro-expression. What Dr. Matsumoto and Sung Hwang are doing in their
classes is raising this unconsciousness to the conscious level—teaching us what
dogs and horses already know but do not talk about because they, like the
people who have not taken the course, they can’t. They are teaching us to be human whisperers.
No comments:
Post a Comment