There is much that is wrong with stop and search but there
is much that is good about it. It is a program
based solely on looking for unlicensed firearms or weapons. As Donny Deutsch
said this morning on Morning Joe (MSNBC), stop and search is a way of focusing
resources. He is an advertizing executive who has successfully applied his professional
skills to his own career. “Stop and frisk” focuses obviously limited work force
to an overwhelming problem. The nature of the task makes it one that is easily criticized.
Admittedly, much of the criticism borders on the inane. They had a video clip of
a rapper saying that it is wrong that police stop and search him when all he is
doing is going to the store—I guess New York should hire psychic police. On the other hand, there are many serious
arguments based on information supplied by the police and demographers.
The first applies to the basic premise: which is that if a
person has a licensed gun, it means that he or she has been vetted and is not a
criminal. On the other side, if he or she has a licensed gun he or she is a
criminal. Obviously, both suppositions can be wrong. The next relates to racial
demographics. Something like 52% of new Yorkers are white but 84% of those
stopped and frisked are black. New York is a big place and if anything, it is a
diverse place. The truth of the matter is that these statistics do not apply to
an actual street in a troubled area. For example, the people on the streets are
all black in some areas and all white in other areas.
And more to Donny Deutsch’s point, if the police receive a
911 call reporting a robbery by a female, white person with red hair, is if
good policy to stop and search and equal number of white people and black
people. Or, if a feminist complaining they are picking on women, should they stop
and search an equal number of females and males to prove they are not anti
female. These are silly examples but the hurtful truth is that in a black
neighborhood more blacks commit crimes than do whites and visa versa. However, the
crime scenes are not predictable; a robber will tend to go where he is not
known and go where the money is.
The real tragedy is that we have to do anything at all but
if we have to do it we, as a society, have to figure out a way to cover all
contingencies?
I can only think of
one circumstance there they do a pretty good job of that and that is the Transportation
Security Administration (TSA) and they do it in a depersonalized way. Rather
than stop and frisk by a tough policeman,who do not know the neighborhood, why not use a “no touch search” with metal detector wands
in high-crime areas by police who know the neighborhood . . . much less effort put into each search with more searches. Search everyone, even red headed females with their shoes
on. If you do that, then the index of suspicion
increases for those who try to avoid a search.
URL: firetreepub.blogspot.com Comments Invited and not moderated
No comments:
Post a Comment