Mitt Romney ran a venture capital business called Bain Capital.
He and his friends would identify companies that were vulnerable, meaning they could
buy the company and then sell the assets for more than the purchase price. They
considered the difference as profit. It isn’t until you look at how this was
done that turned it into “savage” capitalism—a dirty business. We all say the consequences
of bankrupting the company, to destroy unions, and fold pension funds in to the
assets as part of the bankruptcy settlement. We assumed that the original
owners sold the company because they were too honest to steal the pension funds
in such a blatantly obvious way. What was more difficult to see was the relationship
Venture Capital established with the government based on established government
programs to save the company from bankruptcy, thus save jobs. It takes a great
deal of skill and practice to write these grants and Bain became experts in writing
them and shepherding them thorough congress. Its called lobbying. The government
would grant the gargantuan loans and then the company would fold the loan into
the assets and go bankrupt, thus, did not have to pay the loans back. They did
it time after time.
This type of nefarious activity conflates with a practice
called “privatization of government functions”, a process that turns the taxpayers
into second party payers. What it does is disconnect the taxpayer from the
actual cost. Like health insurance, I
pay a steady but high fee to an insurance company and they pay the doctors and
hospitals. The hospital charges me $120,000 for one and on half hour procedure.
What do I care, I don’t have to pay it. They hire war zone cooks and pay them
$200,000 to feed soldiers that are earning $40,000 per year. What do I care, I don’t
have to pay it. The IRS the NSA, the embassy guards are included. Everywhere, it
is the same thing. The irony is that I do have to pay, in fact, we all have to
pay; taxes go up astronomically. The people who are advocating for privatization
of government services are the very same people who cry about the high taxes—it
only makes sense if you look at it through their glasses; they are greedy opportunists
and after they “starve the government to death, they will start to prey on each
other.
This introduces a strange phenomenon referred to as collective
greed, or creating equal opportunity for
greed. Case in point, Darrell Issa wants to privatize the United Postal Service.
He wants American capitalism, which to him means unfettered (unregulated)
freedom to do business to take over government functions. At first, his actions
puzzled me. He is in the car theft business and not package delivery systems
like FedEx, UPS, or DHL. How can he make money, as Romney makes money from
destroying jobs or as a hospital administrator makes money through second party
payer system of health care? It is easy to say that he benefits from having them
bribe him with huge campaign donations to do what he is doing, which is probably
true but there is more.
It is also true that he is a Republican, therefore believes making
money is morally right; riches are the reward for hard work. Those who are rich
should be praised. If you are not rich, it is your own fault; you didn’t work
hard enough, you are not smart enough, or you are just plain lazy, which means
you are undisciplined; being lazy, un-discipline and not working hard is
immoral. Therefore the working class deserves to be poor, and no one should
care in fact they should be punished; ask Ayn Rand, Rand Paul, Eric Cantor, Ron
Johnson, or Gov. McCrory if they care about poor people. In Issa’s GOP brain, privatization
is a way of creating opportunity; therefore, privatization is morally right. Privatization
is promoting capitalism and freedom. His justification for destroying the
United States Postal Service is to create opportunity for others. How can you
are argue against the very basic American beliefs of equal opportunity,
freedom, and capitalism—after all is said an done, it was on these “moral” principles
our Founding Fathers built this country. As a liberal, I simply do not agree
with him.
No comments:
Post a Comment