Duality enters conservative thinking when dealing with entitlements:
they complain about paying for “entitlements”. Medicare, health care in the
form of the Affordable Care Act, and Social Security are not entitlements; we
pay for them but Romney/Ryan claims they are entitlements. Even with those
excluded, there are many other forms of entitlements; environmental protections,
highway systems, mail delivery, military protection, collection of taxes, and
so many other government services it would be hard to name them all. Guaranteed
student loans and housing loans are treated as entitlement. Subsidies to big
farms and oil companies are entitlements.
As citizen of a rich country, and just like five sons of a rich family, we are entitled
to these things through use of government scholarships and student guaranteed
loans. Do you think Romney’s sons used government guaranteed loans to pay for
tuition? Tuition for the kinds of schools these guys attend cost $50,000 a
year. They go to school for five years and there are five sons; that is
$1,250,000 dollars. Consider in the same way health care costs, pension
savings, home mortgages; you do not deserve any of these things unless you can
pay for them; to them that is fair because it is “equal treatment under the law”
and they tell us we should look at it in the same way.
Go through the list and decide which entitlement an Ayn Rand
conservative wants to pay for or does not want to pay for, that is where the
duality enters the picture; they want the freedom, American Freedom Watch, to
decide what they want verses what they do not want. To the politically
naive, the result should be startling. They
do not want to pay for any of them because they are the elite; they deserve
them but want us to pay for them. That was Ayn Rand’s message; there are those
that count and those who do not.
No comments:
Post a Comment