tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-965388961728764200.post4007299265602772063..comments2023-06-30T08:44:05.119-06:00Comments on Firetree / Firetree Publishing: REVENGE PARISAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08470444056299143466noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-965388961728764200.post-64490843900431456102015-11-20T22:17:53.775-06:002015-11-20T22:17:53.775-06:00Does this not contradict your last paragraph? You ...Does this not contradict your last paragraph? You say that the drones are attackers the murderer's and it is okay to kill the supporters. <br /><br />You asked who and where they attack but you then describe exactly who to attack. As your rebuttal on drone attacks, October 21, the pentagon launched operation "Tidal Wave II" which includes a more focused attack strictly on oil. You understanding that Oil being a needed resource during times of war, winters. Increase in prices which in return be affecting the ability to purchase oil in their nation? <br /><br />In the past seven days, a barrel [of heating oil] goes from 20,000 to 65,000 Syrian pounds," an increase of roughly $50 to $170 at the market exchange rate. <br /><br />Up until now I'll agree that the US was not attacking Oil infrastructure but once the change with "Tidal Wave II" their has been over 175 strikes on "IS, ISIL, ISIS" controlled oil infrastructure, which has been rendered ineffective since they have been continually repairing and are still making money from Oil which I thought was how ISIS was to be contained in the first place... <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-965388961728764200.post-16925125068369922292015-11-15T08:38:43.194-06:002015-11-15T08:38:43.194-06:00Yes, I do idolize out President. As for the Presid...Yes, I do idolize out President. As for the President, backing the claim that it was “IS” or ISIL, which you seem to object too, makes no sense without further elucidation. “IS” stands for a group of people who created what they aggrandize by calling themselves an “Islamic State”. Radical members of Islam have joined this group to turn it into the transnational group or “ISIL”, which is what they are today. ISIL is not the sovereign state they want it to be. <br /><br />As for drones hitting civilian targets, a car with a terrorist in it on a highway is not a “civilian establishment”. It is a targeted strike on a murderer. Our news reporters fill the media with reports of what happened and where it happened. The reports contain collateral damage assessment, including “innocent” people killed or wounded, which is not hiding it from our (your) own people. Often these reporters write the reports as critism of President Obama. As for my using the word ‘innocent’, is a supporter of a terrorist innocent? Would we judge a supporter of the killers in Paris to be innocent? <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08470444056299143466noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-965388961728764200.post-28413433354432764782015-11-14T21:45:44.542-06:002015-11-14T21:45:44.542-06:00Your who:
|sis claims attack on Paris, members alr...Your who:<br />|sis claims attack on Paris, members already identifying attackers, who they were, where they were from, who they represented. <br /><br />Your president backs the claim that it was the Islamic State (IS) though he refers to them as ISIL. <br /><br /><br />Your where:<br />Your military already conducts drone strikes against IS in middle east... Lybia, Syria, Pakistan, supposedly eliminating Abu Nabil, Jihadi John, but the US news never shows these strikes. Although your strikes are hitting civilian establishments where they believe ISIS leaders operate. Maybe you choose not to see what your president does as you hold him as an idol. <br /><br />Rather then making up "weapons of mass destruction" I assume it's better to "hide from your own people" Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com